By: Elizabeth K. Miles Construction contracts often include a clause that identifies a stipulated or “liquidated” damage amount for unexcused delay. These clauses assess a fixed sum for each day of delay, thereby relieving the owner from proving its actual damages caused by delay. Although generally thought to protect the owner, liquidated damages clauses may…
Read Full ArticleLitigation attorneys, Ted Warpinski and Christopher Meuler, authored a post for the State Bar of Wisconsin’s Construction & Public Contract Law Section Blog. Their blog post, Should We Assume that Assumption Is a Good Idea? State Wetland Permitting and Act 183, discuss the mechanics of assumed jurisdiction and potential benefits and costs in light of the Wisconsin Legislature’s recent…
Read Full Article
By: James M. Kalny Regardless of whether a company is unionized it is subject to Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act (the “Act”) which guarantees employees the right: to self-organization, to form, join, or assist labor organizations, to bargain collectively through representatives of their own choosing, and to engage in other concerted activities…
Read Full Article
In Krueger v. AllEnergy Hixton, LLC, 2017 AP 1802 (Ct App. August 9, 2018) the Wisconsin Court of Appeals, District IV in a 2-1 decision recognized the claim of anticipatory private nuisance but established a high bar to successfully plead one in court. The case involved a lawsuit filed by a group of Town of…
Read Full Article
By: James E. Lowe Hot on the heels of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) ruling that patent trial discovery conduct can result in the invalidating an otherwise valid patent (Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Merus N.V. (Fed. Cir. 2017)), the CAFC held on June 11, 2018 that a failure of one party…
Read Full Article
By Dillon J. Ambrose & Laurie E. Meyer In Wisconsin Bell v. Labor and Industry Review Commission, et al., decided on June 26, 2018, the Wisconsin Supreme Court made substantial changes to the burden of proving employment discrimination under the Wisconsin Fair Employment Act (“WFEA”). In doing so, the Court departed from a long line…
Read Full Article
On June 22, 2018, the Supreme Court issued its ruling in WesternGeco LLC v. ION Geophysical Corp. This case centered around the question of whether, under the damages provisions of the Patent Act, a patent owner can recover for lost foreign profits when components of a patented invention are shipped overseas for assembly and use….
Read Full Article
A recent decision by the Supreme Court of Wisconsin highlights the need for developers and property owners to be clear and precise in drafting restrictive covenants. Richard Forshee v. Lee Neuschwander, Docket Number 2016AP1608, illustrates that even the state’s highest court can have difficulty in understanding and applying owner intent. The June 5, 2018 decision…
Read Full Article
In Tetra Tech EC, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue, decided this last week, the Wisconsin Supreme Court changed the entire landscape of administrative law in the State of Wisconsin. If your business or municipality deals with administrative regulations—and it most assuredly does—be aware that the law now allows circuit courts to review agency’s legal…
Read Full Article
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) experienced a historic moment yesterday – its 10 millionth patent was issued to Raytheon Co, a major U.S. defense contractor. While it is clear from this landmark moment that there has been an explosion of activity regarding patent application filings in the United States, what does that…
Read Full Article
